Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Initiation of CIRP - Existence of a financial debt - Assignment of debt- The Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) upheld the Adjudicating Authority’s findings, agreeing that: The evidence did not conclusively prove the existence of a financial debt as defined under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The assignment of alleged receivables to the Appellant did not convert them into a financial debt because the transfer was on an “as is where is” basis without warranties of their recoverability or acknowledgment as debt by the Respondent.
Initiation of CIRP - Existence of a financial debt - Assignment of debt- The Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) upheld the Adjudicating Authority’s findings, agreeing that: The evidence did not conclusively prove the existence of a financial debt as defined under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The assignment of alleged receivables to the Appellant did not convert them into a financial debt because the transfer was on an “as is where is” basis without warranties of their recoverability or acknowledgment as debt by the Respondent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
