Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Insolvency and BankruptcyApril 30, 2024Case LawsAT
CIRP - Validity of resolution plan - Nil Payment to Operational Creditors - waterfall mechanism - The Appellate Tribunal acknowledged the appellants' contention that fairness and equity should be ensured in the distribution of funds, including payment to operational creditors. However, it held that since the liquidation value of the corporate debtor was NIL, and the amount distributed to the corporate debtor under the resolution plan would also be NIL, the plan did not violate Section 30(2)(b) of the IBC. The Tribunal upheld the commercial wisdom of the CoC in approving the resolution plan. It cited established legal precedents that the CoC's decision is beyond judicial review, especially when it does not contravene any provisions of the law. The Tribunal found no error in the impugned order and dismissed the appeal.
CIRP - Validity of resolution plan - Nil Payment to Operational Creditors - waterfall mechanism - The Appellate Tribunal acknowledged the appellants' contention that fairness and equity should be ensured in the distribution of funds, including payment to operational creditors. However, it held that since the liquidation value of the corporate debtor was NIL, and the amount distributed to the corporate debtor under the resolution plan would also be NIL, the plan did not violate Section 30(2)(b) of the IBC. The Tribunal upheld the commercial wisdom of the CoC in approving the resolution plan. It cited established legal precedents that the CoC's decision is beyond judicial review, especially when it does not contravene any provisions of the law. The Tribunal found no error in the impugned order and dismissed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
