Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Refund of excess duty paid under protest - date on which notification came into effect. - The Tribunal referred to Section 5A of the Central Excise Act, which stipulates that a notification comes into force upon publication in the official gazette and offering for sale on the date of its issue. It cited precedents and held that the notifications were effective only from their publication dates, not from the issue dates. The Tribunal upheld the appellant's argument, emphasizing that the notifications were not effective on the specified dates due to non-publication.
Refund of excess duty paid under protest - date on which notification came into effect. - The Tribunal referred to Section 5A of the Central Excise Act, which stipulates that a notification comes into force upon publication in the official gazette and offering for sale on the date of its issue. It cited precedents and held that the notifications were effective only from their publication dates, not from the issue dates. The Tribunal upheld the appellant's argument, emphasizing that the notifications were not effective on the specified dates due to non-publication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
