Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Validity of order of High Court remanding back the Matter to the Tribunal for re-consideration - Failure of the Department to follow the instructions given by the CESTAT - Doctrine of Merger - The High Court, in its judgment, refutes the appellant's claim of non-furnishing of a letter dated 20.01.2001, stating that the letter originated from the appellant itself and was not relied upon by the authority to draw adverse inferences. Therefore, the failure to provide it does not prejudice the appellant's case. The Court also acknowledges the lack of legal validity in the order of review passed on 08.03.2010 but refrains from setting aside the impugned order. Instead, it remands the matter back to the tribunal for fresh adjudication, allowing both parties to present their arguments. The appeals are disposed of with no costs imposed.
Validity of order of High Court remanding back the Matter to the Tribunal for re-consideration - Failure of the Department to follow the instructions given by the CESTAT - Doctrine of Merger - The High Court, in its judgment, refutes the appellant's claim of non-furnishing of a letter dated 20.01.2001, stating that the letter originated from the appellant itself and was not relied upon by the authority to draw adverse inferences. Therefore, the failure to provide it does not prejudice the appellant's case. The Court also acknowledges the lack of legal validity in the order of review passed on 08.03.2010 but refrains from setting aside the impugned order. Instead, it remands the matter back to the tribunal for fresh adjudication, allowing both parties to present their arguments. The appeals are disposed of with no costs imposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
