Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Extended period of Limitation - suppression of facts or not - The Tribunal observes that the dispute revolves around the classification of taxable services, which involves the interpretation of statutory provisions. It finds that there was no suppression of facts by the appellant, as they regularly filed returns and cooperated with the authorities. - The Tribunal holds that the demand for service tax beyond the normal period of limitation is not sustainable. Thus, it sets aside the demand under the category of 'supply of tangible goods service'.
Extended period of Limitation - suppression of facts or not - The Tribunal observes that the dispute revolves around the classification of taxable services, which involves the interpretation of statutory provisions. It finds that there was no suppression of facts by the appellant, as they regularly filed returns and cooperated with the authorities. - The Tribunal holds that the demand for service tax beyond the normal period of limitation is not sustainable. Thus, it sets aside the demand under the category of 'supply of tangible goods service'.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.