Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Extended period of Limitation - suppression of facts or not - The Tribunal observes that the dispute revolves around the classification of taxable services, which involves the interpretation of statutory provisions. It finds that there was no suppression of facts by the appellant, as they regularly filed returns and cooperated with the authorities. - The Tribunal holds that the demand for service tax beyond the normal period of limitation is not sustainable. Thus, it sets aside the demand under the category of 'supply of tangible goods service'.
Extended period of Limitation - suppression of facts or not - The Tribunal observes that the dispute revolves around the classification of taxable services, which involves the interpretation of statutory provisions. It finds that there was no suppression of facts by the appellant, as they regularly filed returns and cooperated with the authorities. - The Tribunal holds that the demand for service tax beyond the normal period of limitation is not sustainable. Thus, it sets aside the demand under the category of 'supply of tangible goods service'.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.