Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Correct head of income - Income from leasing or letting out the properties in shopping-cum-entertainment Mall - “income from business” or “income from house property” - After careful consideration, the High Court affirmed the decision of the CIT(A) and the ITAT that the income derived from leasing out properties in the mall should be categorized as "income from business." The Court noted that the assessee company's main object, as per its Memorandum of Article and Association, involved various business activities related to owning, leasing, and managing properties like multiplexes, cineplexes, and shopping malls. Therefore, the income from leasing out properties in the mall constituted income from business under Section 28 of the Income Tax Act.
Correct head of income - Income from leasing or letting out the properties in shopping-cum-entertainment Mall - “income from business” or “income from house property” - After careful consideration, the High Court affirmed the decision of the CIT(A) and the ITAT that the income derived from leasing out properties in the mall should be categorized as "income from business." The Court noted that the assessee company's main object, as per its Memorandum of Article and Association, involved various business activities related to owning, leasing, and managing properties like multiplexes, cineplexes, and shopping malls. Therefore, the income from leasing out properties in the mall constituted income from business under Section 28 of the Income Tax Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.