Coercive recovery during GST searches is restrained pending scrutiny, preserving normal business operations and requiring adherence to investigation g...
COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Prosecution Proceedings - Offence u/s 276B and 278B - not depositing the TDS amount - The court acknowledged that the petitioners provided reasonable explanations for the delay in depositing the TDS amount, considering factors like insolvency proceedings and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. - The court found merit in the petitioners' reliance on Circular No. F No 285/90/2008-IT(Inv-I)/05 dated 24.04.2008, as it outlines conditions for prosecution under the Act. Additionally, the court cited precedents from both the Jharkhand High Court and its own jurisdiction, emphasizing that once the TDS amount with interest has been deposited, criminal proceedings should not continue.
Prosecution Proceedings - Offence u/s 276B and 278B - not depositing the TDS amount - The court acknowledged that the petitioners provided reasonable explanations for the delay in depositing the TDS amount, considering factors like insolvency proceedings and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. - The court found merit in the petitioners' reliance on Circular No. F No 285/90/2008-IT(Inv-I)/05 dated 24.04.2008, as it outlines conditions for prosecution under the Act. Additionally, the court cited precedents from both the Jharkhand High Court and its own jurisdiction, emphasizing that once the TDS amount with interest has been deposited, criminal proceedings should not continue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
