Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Insolvency and BankruptcyApril 13, 2024Case LawsAT
Rejection of Section 7 Application filed by the Appellant (homebuyers) on the ground of non-compliance of Section 7, sub-section (1), 2nd Proviso - decree-holder is class of Financial Creditor or not - The tribunal noted that the appellants were only four in number, whereas the total units allotted were 488. The Code requires that a petition on behalf of homebuyers (as financial creditors in a class) is maintainable only if either 100 in number or 10% of the total allottees join the petition. The appellants did not meet this threshold. - Regarding the argument of Finacial Credit: the tribunal disagreed, referencing the definition under the IBC that includes financial creditors as those to whom a financial debt is owed. The tribunal highlighted that despite the RERA order, the appellants remained allottees and thus were required to meet the threshold set out u/s 7 of the Code.
Rejection of Section 7 Application filed by the Appellant (homebuyers) on the ground of non-compliance of Section 7, sub-section (1), 2nd Proviso - decree-holder is class of Financial Creditor or not - The tribunal noted that the appellants were only four in number, whereas the total units allotted were 488. The Code requires that a petition on behalf of homebuyers (as financial creditors in a class) is maintainable only if either 100 in number or 10% of the total allottees join the petition. The appellants did not meet this threshold. - Regarding the argument of Finacial Credit: the tribunal disagreed, referencing the definition under the IBC that includes financial creditors as those to whom a financial debt is owed. The tribunal highlighted that despite the RERA order, the appellants remained allottees and thus were required to meet the threshold set out u/s 7 of the Code.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
