<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Dismisses Homebuyers&#039; Petition for Non-Compliance with Insolvency Code&#039;s Threshold Requirements.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76566</link>
    <description>Rejection of Section 7 Application filed by the Appellant (homebuyers) on the ground of non-compliance of Section 7, sub-section (1), 2nd Proviso - decree-holder is class of Financial Creditor or not - The tribunal noted that the appellants were only four in number, whereas the total units allotted were 488. The Code requires that a petition on behalf of homebuyers (as financial creditors in a class) is maintainable only if either 100 in number or 10% of the total allottees join the petition. The appellants did not meet this threshold. - Regarding the argument of Finacial Credit: the tribunal disagreed, referencing the definition under the IBC that includes financial creditors as those to whom a financial debt is owed. The tribunal highlighted that despite the RERA order, the appellants remained allottees and thus were required to meet the threshold set out u/s 7 of the Code.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2024 09:17:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2024 09:17:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Dismisses Homebuyers&#039; Petition for Non-Compliance with Insolvency Code&#039;s Threshold Requirements.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76566</link>
      <description>Rejection of Section 7 Application filed by the Appellant (homebuyers) on the ground of non-compliance of Section 7, sub-section (1), 2nd Proviso - decree-holder is class of Financial Creditor or not - The tribunal noted that the appellants were only four in number, whereas the total units allotted were 488. The Code requires that a petition on behalf of homebuyers (as financial creditors in a class) is maintainable only if either 100 in number or 10% of the total allottees join the petition. The appellants did not meet this threshold. - Regarding the argument of Finacial Credit: the tribunal disagreed, referencing the definition under the IBC that includes financial creditors as those to whom a financial debt is owed. The tribunal highlighted that despite the RERA order, the appellants remained allottees and thus were required to meet the threshold set out u/s 7 of the Code.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2024 09:17:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>