Pre-amendment reassessment limitation bars late notices under the preserved regime, invalidating consequential reassessment for affected earlier asses...
Cash-sales explanations for bank deposits require documentary reconciliation; reassessment notice survived where effective response time was available...
Functional comparability in transfer pricing prevents ad hoc arm's length adjustments where functions, assets, risks and reliable comparables are unes...
Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
Page of 4920
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 98394 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Eligibility of petitioner in seeking clearance of the goods - High Seas Sale agreement stands cancelled - The petitioner contested the jurisdiction of the authorities, sought to quash an impugned letter, and requested the release of containers and amendment of the Bill of Entry. Additionally, the petitioner challenged the validity of a CBIC notification and requested detention and demurrage waivers. The High court acknowledged the petitioner's entitlement to seek clearance due to the cancellation of a High Seas Sale agreement and permitted the submission of an application to the designated Customs Officer. Respondent No. 6 raised no objections, and the court directed a timely decision on the application, while keeping all contentions open.
Eligibility of petitioner in seeking clearance of the goods - High Seas Sale agreement stands cancelled - The petitioner contested the jurisdiction of the authorities, sought to quash an impugned letter, and requested the release of containers and amendment of the Bill of Entry. Additionally, the petitioner challenged the validity of a CBIC notification and requested detention and demurrage waivers. The High court acknowledged the petitioner's entitlement to seek clearance due to the cancellation of a High Seas Sale agreement and permitted the submission of an application to the designated Customs Officer. Respondent No. 6 raised no objections, and the court directed a timely decision on the application, while keeping all contentions open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.