Petitioner allowed to clear goods after stepping into defaulting buyer's position in High Seas Sale agreement

The Bombay HC disposed of a petition seeking goods clearance following cancellation of a High Seas Sale agreement due to respondent's payment default. The petitioner claimed entitlement to clear goods after stepping into the defaulting party's position. With no objection from the original buyer, the HC directed the petitioner to file a proper application with the designated Customs Officer within two days for clearance either through bill of entry amendment or fresh filing, as legally permissible.

---

---

Issues Involved:
The primary contention involves the petitioner seeking clearance of goods through a petition filed u/s Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the actions of Respondent No. 3 and seeking various reliefs including declaration of acting beyond jurisdiction, quashing of impugned letter, and issuance of writs for clearance and amendment of Bill of Entry.

Details of the Judgment:

1. The petitioner, as the original importer of goods, entered into a High Seas Sale Agreement with Respondent No. 6, which was later canceled due to payment default by Respondent No. 6, leading the petitioner to seek amendment or filing of a fresh Bill of Entry for clearance of goods.

2. The petitioner argued that any investigation into Respondent No. 6's antecedents should not affect the clearance of goods, emphasizing the losses being incurred due to the goods being held.

3. The goods in question are contained in 43 containers belonging to Respondent No. 8, Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A., with any inter se issues between the petitioner and Respondent No. 8 expressly kept open.

4. The petitioner submitted a letter requesting cancellation/amendment of the Bill of Entry and permission to file a fresh Bill of Entry in the name of the actual importer, supported by legal entitlement for clearance.

5. The Court considered the submissions of both parties, with Respondent No. 6 having no objection to the goods being cleared by the petitioner, and the respondents raising contentions primarily against Respondent No. 6.

6. The Court directed the petitioner to file a proper application with the designated Customs Officer within two days, raising all permissible contentions, for a decision on clearance after granting an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties, including Respondent No. 8.

7. A decision on the application is to be rendered within two weeks, keeping all contentions open, and the petition was disposed of with no costs, with parties instructed to act on an authenticated copy of the order.

---