Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Revocation of CHA License - appellant failed to verify the address at which the two clients operated and that requirement of ‘know your customer (KYC)’ was entirely different - The appellant was accused of breaching obligations related to verifying client identity and operations at the declared address. Despite the appellant's argument of compliance with KYC norms and reliance on precedent, the tribunal found that they failed to exercise due diligence in verifying client antecedents, especially in the diamond trade. While setting aside certain penalties, the tribunal upheld the forfeiture of the security deposit, emphasizing the importance of regulatory compliance and diligence in customs brokerage.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
