Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Validity of Assessment order - demand of GST - The petitioner asserts that an error was committed by entering the same invoice number in multiple e-way bills - The High Court noted that the petitioner had indeed submitted a reply on 28.08.2023, explaining the error and attaching relevant bill copies. However, the impugned order did not provide reasons for rejecting the petitioner's reply and documents, which led to the conclusion that there was a lack of proper consideration. - The High Court quashed the impugned order dated and remanded the matter to the assessing officer for reconsideration.
Validity of Assessment order - demand of GST - The petitioner asserts that an error was committed by entering the same invoice number in multiple e-way bills - The High Court noted that the petitioner had indeed submitted a reply on 28.08.2023, explaining the error and attaching relevant bill copies. However, the impugned order did not provide reasons for rejecting the petitioner's reply and documents, which led to the conclusion that there was a lack of proper consideration. - The High Court quashed the impugned order dated and remanded the matter to the assessing officer for reconsideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
