Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
Validity of Assessment order - demand of GST - The petitioner asserts that an error was committed by entering the same invoice number in multiple e-way bills - The High Court noted that the petitioner had indeed submitted a reply on 28.08.2023, explaining the error and attaching relevant bill copies. However, the impugned order did not provide reasons for rejecting the petitioner's reply and documents, which led to the conclusion that there was a lack of proper consideration. - The High Court quashed the impugned order dated and remanded the matter to the assessing officer for reconsideration.
Validity of Assessment order - demand of GST - The petitioner asserts that an error was committed by entering the same invoice number in multiple e-way bills - The High Court noted that the petitioner had indeed submitted a reply on 28.08.2023, explaining the error and attaching relevant bill copies. However, the impugned order did not provide reasons for rejecting the petitioner's reply and documents, which led to the conclusion that there was a lack of proper consideration. - The High Court quashed the impugned order dated and remanded the matter to the assessing officer for reconsideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
