https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76277 Validity of Assessment order - demand of GST - The petitioner asserts that an error was committed by entering the same invoice number in multiple e-way bills - The High Court noted that the petitioner had indeed submitted a reply on 28.08.2023, explaining the error and attaching relevant bill copies. However, the impugned order did not provide reasons for rejecting the petitioner's reply and documents, which led to the conclusion that there was a lack of proper consideration. - The High Court quashed the impugned order dated and remanded the matter to the assessing officer for reconsideration. en-us Tue, 02 Apr 2024 08:52:09 +0530 Tue, 02 Apr 2024 08:52:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76277 Validity of Assessment order - demand of GST - The petitioner asserts that an error was committed by entering the same invoice number in multiple e-way bills - The High Court noted that the petitioner had indeed submitted a reply on 28.08.2023, explaining the error and attaching relevant bill copies. However, the impugned order did not provide reasons for rejecting the petitioner's reply and documents, which led to the conclusion that there was a lack of proper consideration. - The High Court quashed the impugned order dated and remanded the matter to the assessing officer for reconsideration. Highlights GST Tue, 02 Apr 2024 08:52:09 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76277