Credit-note turnover adjustments preserve inverted-duty refunds, while ministerial re-computation does not constitute an impermissible appellate reman...
Revisional jurisdiction over export quota premium deductions requires both error and Revenue prejudice; a permissible assessment view cannot be displa...
Recovery under demand notices based on alert issued 5 years ago - Bonds for Warehoused goods has already expired - The High Court determined that the demand notice issued under Section 72(1) of the Customs Act in 2013 became unenforceable when no concrete measures were undertaken within a reasonable period to execute the notice. The Court highlighted the lapse in action for nearly ten years, rendering the subsequent enforcement attempts invalid. - The Court found the Alert Notice issued in 2018 to be unjustified and illegal, as it sought to enforce an expired and redundant demand. This action was deemed contrary to the provisions of the Customs Act and the principles of limitation.
Recovery under demand notices based on alert issued 5 years ago - Bonds for Warehoused goods has already expired - The High Court determined that the demand notice issued under Section 72(1) of the Customs Act in 2013 became unenforceable when no concrete measures were undertaken within a reasonable period to execute the notice. The Court highlighted the lapse in action for nearly ten years, rendering the subsequent enforcement attempts invalid. - The Court found the Alert Notice issued in 2018 to be unjustified and illegal, as it sought to enforce an expired and redundant demand. This action was deemed contrary to the provisions of the Customs Act and the principles of limitation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
