Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CENVAT Credit - place of removal for the GTA Services provided under a F.O.R sale contract - The High Court determined that in an F.O.R sale, where ownership remains with the seller until delivery at the buyer's premises, the place of removal should be considered the buyer's premises. This interpretation was supported by relevant Supreme Court decisions and a circular issued by the CBIC. The Tribunal's decision to consider the factory gate as the place of removal was deemed unjustified. - The High Court concluded that the appellant is indeed eligible for CENVAT credit on outward transportation beyond the place of removal.
CENVAT Credit - place of removal for the GTA Services provided under a F.O.R sale contract - The High Court determined that in an F.O.R sale, where ownership remains with the seller until delivery at the buyer's premises, the place of removal should be considered the buyer's premises. This interpretation was supported by relevant Supreme Court decisions and a circular issued by the CBIC. The Tribunal's decision to consider the factory gate as the place of removal was deemed unjustified. - The High Court concluded that the appellant is indeed eligible for CENVAT credit on outward transportation beyond the place of removal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
