<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Rules Seller&#039;s Ownership Extends to Buyer&#039;s Premises in CENVAT Credit Case for GTA Services.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76256</link>
    <description>CENVAT Credit - place of removal for the GTA Services provided under a F.O.R sale contract - The High Court determined that in an F.O.R sale, where ownership remains with the seller until delivery at the buyer&#039;s premises, the place of removal should be considered the buyer&#039;s premises. This interpretation was supported by relevant Supreme Court decisions and a circular issued by the CBIC. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to consider the factory gate as the place of removal was deemed unjustified. - The High Court concluded that the appellant is indeed eligible for CENVAT credit on outward transportation beyond the place of removal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 08:07:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 08:07:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Rules Seller&#039;s Ownership Extends to Buyer&#039;s Premises in CENVAT Credit Case for GTA Services.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76256</link>
      <description>CENVAT Credit - place of removal for the GTA Services provided under a F.O.R sale contract - The High Court determined that in an F.O.R sale, where ownership remains with the seller until delivery at the buyer&#039;s premises, the place of removal should be considered the buyer&#039;s premises. This interpretation was supported by relevant Supreme Court decisions and a circular issued by the CBIC. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to consider the factory gate as the place of removal was deemed unjustified. - The High Court concluded that the appellant is indeed eligible for CENVAT credit on outward transportation beyond the place of removal.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 08:07:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>