Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision u/s 263 - issue of shares at premium - The Tribunal affirmed the PCIT's findings regarding the inadequacy of the AO's examination of the valuation of CCDs. It concluded that there was no error in discrediting the valuation method adopted by the appellant. - Despite the appellant's contentions regarding jurisdictional matters, the Tribunal upheld the validity of the orders passed by the PCIT and AO. - The Tribunal agreed with the AO's application of section 56(2)(viib) and the rejection of the DCF method, thereby affirming the addition made to the appellant's income.
Revision u/s 263 - issue of shares at premium - The Tribunal affirmed the PCIT's findings regarding the inadequacy of the AO's examination of the valuation of CCDs. It concluded that there was no error in discrediting the valuation method adopted by the appellant. - Despite the appellant's contentions regarding jurisdictional matters, the Tribunal upheld the validity of the orders passed by the PCIT and AO. - The Tribunal agreed with the AO's application of section 56(2)(viib) and the rejection of the DCF method, thereby affirming the addition made to the appellant's income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
