<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Confirms PCIT&#039;s Rejection of CCD Valuation Method, Supports Income Addition Under IT Act Section 56(2)(viib.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76246</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - issue of shares at premium - The Tribunal affirmed the PCIT&#039;s findings regarding the inadequacy of the AO&#039;s examination of the valuation of CCDs. It concluded that there was no error in discrediting the valuation method adopted by the appellant. - Despite the appellant&#039;s contentions regarding jurisdictional matters, the Tribunal upheld the validity of the orders passed by the PCIT and AO. - The Tribunal agreed with the AO&#039;s application of section 56(2)(viib) and the rejection of the DCF method, thereby affirming the addition made to the appellant&#039;s income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 20:39:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 20:39:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Confirms PCIT&#039;s Rejection of CCD Valuation Method, Supports Income Addition Under IT Act Section 56(2)(viib.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76246</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - issue of shares at premium - The Tribunal affirmed the PCIT&#039;s findings regarding the inadequacy of the AO&#039;s examination of the valuation of CCDs. It concluded that there was no error in discrediting the valuation method adopted by the appellant. - Despite the appellant&#039;s contentions regarding jurisdictional matters, the Tribunal upheld the validity of the orders passed by the PCIT and AO. - The Tribunal agreed with the AO&#039;s application of section 56(2)(viib) and the rejection of the DCF method, thereby affirming the addition made to the appellant&#039;s income.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 20:39:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>