Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Addition u/s 69A - unexplained cash deposits in the bank account - onus to prove - The Tribunal noted that the appellant had provided evidence to support the source of cash deposits, demonstrating legitimate cash withdrawals preceding the deposits. It concluded that the Assessing Officer had not presented any adverse material to refute the appellant's claims. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the impugned addition under section 69A.
Addition u/s 69A - unexplained cash deposits in the bank account - onus to prove - The Tribunal noted that the appellant had provided evidence to support the source of cash deposits, demonstrating legitimate cash withdrawals preceding the deposits. It concluded that the Assessing Officer had not presented any adverse material to refute the appellant's claims. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the impugned addition under section 69A.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
