Mandatory textile export qualifiers distinguish flame-retardant fabrics from other listed fabrics for automated identification under the textiles ince...
Personal liberty safeguards restrict arrest after court-directed GST appearance, requiring interim release where authorities overreach pending proceed...
Alternative statutory remedy and delay bar GST writ challenges despite pending rectification, while distinct subject matter permits parallel proceedin...
Unverified Insight Portal Information Cannot Justify Reassessment Without a Verified Taxpayer-Specific Income-Escape Nexus or Demonstrated Application...
Assessing Officer jurisdiction after statutory transfer invalidates reassessment notices issued by transferor officers and nullifies resulting proceed...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 97809 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insolvency and BankruptcyMarch 23, 2024Case LawsAT
Dismissal of Section 9 petition - initiation of CIRP - Dues of employees - The NCLAT examined the employment tenure of the appellant and found evidence supporting continuous employment with the corporate debtor until resignation. It rejected the respondent's argument regarding employment with another entity. - NCLAT found that the respondent had disputed the appellant's claims prior to the section 9 application, indicating a pre-existing dispute. Thus, the court deemed the application inadmissible based on the principles established in the Mobilox judgment.
Dismissal of Section 9 petition - initiation of CIRP - Dues of employees - The NCLAT examined the employment tenure of the appellant and found evidence supporting continuous employment with the corporate debtor until resignation. It rejected the respondent's argument regarding employment with another entity. - NCLAT found that the respondent had disputed the appellant's claims prior to the section 9 application, indicating a pre-existing dispute. Thus, the court deemed the application inadmissible based on the principles established in the Mobilox judgment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.