Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
TP Adjustment - Comparable selection - determination of arm’s length prices (ALP) - The High Court observed that the dissimilarity in products sold and their respective turnovers could significantly impact the profitability of an entity. Despite acknowledging significant differences and accepting the appellant's arguments, the ITAT failed to entirely exclude Modicare. The Court considered this a vital infirmity and directed the ITAT to re-examine the appropriateness of including Modicare and the functional difference in marketing strategy between the entities.
TP Adjustment - Comparable selection - determination of arm’s length prices (ALP) - The High Court observed that the dissimilarity in products sold and their respective turnovers could significantly impact the profitability of an entity. Despite acknowledging significant differences and accepting the appellant's arguments, the ITAT failed to entirely exclude Modicare. The Court considered this a vital infirmity and directed the ITAT to re-examine the appropriateness of including Modicare and the functional difference in marketing strategy between the entities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.