Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Rejection of the books of account of the assessee company u/s. 145(3) - Estimation of income - The ITAT found the rejection of books of accounts by the AO unjustified as there was no evidence of incorrectness or incompleteness. - The AO's reliance on media clippings and reports without concrete proof was deemed insufficient to reject the books. - On the issue of cash deposits during demonetization, the Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer's presumption of antedating sales and earning super profits lacked substantiation and relied heavily on speculation. - The Tribunal rejected the AO's presumption of a 25% profit margin on sales and found no basis for the addition.
Rejection of the books of account of the assessee company u/s. 145(3) - Estimation of income - The ITAT found the rejection of books of accounts by the AO unjustified as there was no evidence of incorrectness or incompleteness. - The AO's reliance on media clippings and reports without concrete proof was deemed insufficient to reject the books. - On the issue of cash deposits during demonetization, the Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer's presumption of antedating sales and earning super profits lacked substantiation and relied heavily on speculation. - The Tribunal rejected the AO's presumption of a 25% profit margin on sales and found no basis for the addition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
