<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Rejects Income Tax Officer&#039;s Claims; No Evidence Found Against Company&#039;s Financial Records During Demonetization.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75926</link>
    <description>Rejection of the books of account of the assessee company u/s. 145(3) - Estimation of income - The ITAT found the rejection of books of accounts by the AO unjustified as there was no evidence of incorrectness or incompleteness. - The AO&#039;s reliance on media clippings and reports without concrete proof was deemed insufficient to reject the books. - On the issue of cash deposits during demonetization, the Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer&#039;s presumption of antedating sales and earning super profits lacked substantiation and relied heavily on speculation. - The Tribunal rejected the AO&#039;s presumption of a 25% profit margin on sales and found no basis for the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:23:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:23:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Rejects Income Tax Officer&#039;s Claims; No Evidence Found Against Company&#039;s Financial Records During Demonetization.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75926</link>
      <description>Rejection of the books of account of the assessee company u/s. 145(3) - Estimation of income - The ITAT found the rejection of books of accounts by the AO unjustified as there was no evidence of incorrectness or incompleteness. - The AO&#039;s reliance on media clippings and reports without concrete proof was deemed insufficient to reject the books. - On the issue of cash deposits during demonetization, the Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer&#039;s presumption of antedating sales and earning super profits lacked substantiation and relied heavily on speculation. - The Tribunal rejected the AO&#039;s presumption of a 25% profit margin on sales and found no basis for the addition.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:23:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>