Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Valuation of imported goods - inclusion of royalty and the cost of advertisement incurred by the Appellant in India in assessable value - related party - The Tribunal allowed the appeals, stating that the royalty payments related to the licensed products could not be added to the transaction value of imported goods as they did not satisfy the conditions laid out in the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007. Similarly, it held that advertisement expenses were post-import activities and should not be included in the transaction value. The Tribunal emphasized the absence of a direct relationship between the appellant and suppliers under the related persons' definition, affecting the valuation of imported goods.
Valuation of imported goods - inclusion of royalty and the cost of advertisement incurred by the Appellant in India in assessable value - related party - The Tribunal allowed the appeals, stating that the royalty payments related to the licensed products could not be added to the transaction value of imported goods as they did not satisfy the conditions laid out in the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007. Similarly, it held that advertisement expenses were post-import activities and should not be included in the transaction value. The Tribunal emphasized the absence of a direct relationship between the appellant and suppliers under the related persons' definition, affecting the valuation of imported goods.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.