Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Levy of Service tax - Business auxiliary service - commission retained/earned towards the service rendered by them to the co-GSA/IATA - The Tribunal finds that the appellant's activities do not fall under "Business Auxiliary Services" as alleged by the revenue. It determines that the appellants act as principal-to-principal in their transactions and do not serve as commission agents for other GSA/IATA operators. - Further, the Tribunal agrees with the appellant's argument that it was issued beyond the prescribed period and finds no evidence of suppression or intent to evade tax.
Levy of Service tax - Business auxiliary service - commission retained/earned towards the service rendered by them to the co-GSA/IATA - The Tribunal finds that the appellant's activities do not fall under "Business Auxiliary Services" as alleged by the revenue. It determines that the appellants act as principal-to-principal in their transactions and do not serve as commission agents for other GSA/IATA operators. - Further, the Tribunal agrees with the appellant's argument that it was issued beyond the prescribed period and finds no evidence of suppression or intent to evade tax.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
