<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Rules Appellant&#039;s Activities Not &quot;Business Auxiliary Services,&quot; Notice Issued Late, No Tax Evasion Found.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75855</link>
    <description>Levy of Service tax - Business auxiliary service - commission retained/earned towards the service rendered by them to the co-GSA/IATA - The Tribunal finds that the appellant&#039;s activities do not fall under &quot;Business Auxiliary Services&quot; as alleged by the revenue. It determines that the appellants act as principal-to-principal in their transactions and do not serve as commission agents for other GSA/IATA operators. - Further, the Tribunal agrees with the appellant&#039;s argument that it was issued beyond the prescribed period and finds no evidence of suppression or intent to evade tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:15:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:15:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Rules Appellant&#039;s Activities Not &quot;Business Auxiliary Services,&quot; Notice Issued Late, No Tax Evasion Found.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75855</link>
      <description>Levy of Service tax - Business auxiliary service - commission retained/earned towards the service rendered by them to the co-GSA/IATA - The Tribunal finds that the appellant&#039;s activities do not fall under &quot;Business Auxiliary Services&quot; as alleged by the revenue. It determines that the appellants act as principal-to-principal in their transactions and do not serve as commission agents for other GSA/IATA operators. - Further, the Tribunal agrees with the appellant&#039;s argument that it was issued beyond the prescribed period and finds no evidence of suppression or intent to evade tax.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:15:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>