Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Advance Authorisation Scheme - Non-fulfilment of Export Obligation - fraudulent activities - allegation of collusion with the Customs officials - The CESTAT examined the allegations against the appellant and the findings of the adjudicating authority. It noted that while the adjudicating authority implicated the appellant in fraudulent activities, there was a lack of concrete evidence supporting these allegations. Furthermore, the court observed that the involvement of customs officers, mentioned in the proceedings, was not substantiated with adequate details or evidence. Consequently, the court found that the penalties imposed on the appellant lacked a legal basis.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
