Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Registration u/s 80G(5) - The rejection was based on allegations of discrepancy in the organization's name, violation of FCRA provisions, and involvement in religious conversion activities. - Providing benefit to any particular religion, caste or community - The Assessee contested these allegations, citing clerical errors, lack of evidence, and violation of natural justice principles. - The Tribunal criticized the lack of confrontation of allegations with the Assessee. They deemed it a violation of natural justice and directed the CIT(E) to provide the Assessee with all relevant information and explanations before reaching a conclusion.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
