Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Addition u/s 69A - unexplained cash deposits in the saving bank - The tribunal found the orders of the Revenue authorities to be arbitrary, with a failure to consider the appellant's submissions and evidence. - The tribunal found that the AO had erroneously attributed cash deposits to a bank account not belonging to the appellant, and despite being made aware of this error, the ld. CIT(A) confirmed the addition. Furthermore, the tribunal noted that the appellant had disclosed her business income under section 44AD, yet the authorities failed to provide any reasoned basis for rejecting her claim regarding the cash deposits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.