Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Rejection of Application for Pre-Packaged Insolvency Resolution Process (PPIRP) based on Ineligibility or Deficiency in Application - The NCLAT found the application was indeed complete and compliant with the IBC requirements, indicating an error in the NCLT's rejection based on the merits of the base resolution plan, which was premature and outside the scope of examination at the application stage. - The NCLAT clarified that the statutory scheme of the IBC does not envisage consideration of the base resolution plan's merits at the application stage. The Tribunal emphasized that the scheme mandates examination of the resolution plan's approval by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) post the initiation of PPIRP, with the base resolution plan neither being final nor requiring adjudicatory approval at the application stage.
Rejection of Application for Pre-Packaged Insolvency Resolution Process (PPIRP) based on Ineligibility or Deficiency in Application - The NCLAT found the application was indeed complete and compliant with the IBC requirements, indicating an error in the NCLT's rejection based on the merits of the base resolution plan, which was premature and outside the scope of examination at the application stage. - The NCLAT clarified that the statutory scheme of the IBC does not envisage consideration of the base resolution plan's merits at the application stage. The Tribunal emphasized that the scheme mandates examination of the resolution plan's approval by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) post the initiation of PPIRP, with the base resolution plan neither being final nor requiring adjudicatory approval at the application stage.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
