<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>NCLAT Overturns NCLT, Approves Pre-Packaged Insolvency Application, Stresses Compliance with Insolvency Code.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75459</link>
    <description>Rejection of Application for Pre-Packaged Insolvency Resolution Process (PPIRP) based on Ineligibility or Deficiency in Application - The NCLAT found the application was indeed complete and compliant with the IBC requirements, indicating an error in the NCLT&#039;s rejection based on the merits of the base resolution plan, which was premature and outside the scope of examination at the application stage. - The NCLAT clarified that the statutory scheme of the IBC does not envisage consideration of the base resolution plan&#039;s merits at the application stage. The Tribunal emphasized that the scheme mandates examination of the resolution plan&#039;s approval by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) post the initiation of PPIRP, with the base resolution plan neither being final nor requiring adjudicatory approval at the application stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 09:07:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 09:07:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>NCLAT Overturns NCLT, Approves Pre-Packaged Insolvency Application, Stresses Compliance with Insolvency Code.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75459</link>
      <description>Rejection of Application for Pre-Packaged Insolvency Resolution Process (PPIRP) based on Ineligibility or Deficiency in Application - The NCLAT found the application was indeed complete and compliant with the IBC requirements, indicating an error in the NCLT&#039;s rejection based on the merits of the base resolution plan, which was premature and outside the scope of examination at the application stage. - The NCLAT clarified that the statutory scheme of the IBC does not envisage consideration of the base resolution plan&#039;s merits at the application stage. The Tribunal emphasized that the scheme mandates examination of the resolution plan&#039;s approval by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) post the initiation of PPIRP, with the base resolution plan neither being final nor requiring adjudicatory approval at the application stage.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 09:07:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>