Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96000 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Dishonor of cheques - Condonation of delay of 1259 days in filing the complaint for an offence punishable u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Exercise of Discretion by Lower Courts- sufficient reason to condone the delay or not - The High courts uphold the discretion exercised by the lower courts, emphasizing the importance of balancing procedural requirements with substantive justice. - Various legal principles and precedents are cited and analyzed throughout the proceedings, including the liberal interpretation of the concept of "sufficient cause" for condonation of delay and the significance of balancing substantive justice with procedural requirements. - Ultimately, the court dismisses the petition, affirming the lower courts' exercise of discretion to condone the delay.
Dishonor of cheques - Condonation of delay of 1259 days in filing the complaint for an offence punishable u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Exercise of Discretion by Lower Courts- sufficient reason to condone the delay or not - The High courts uphold the discretion exercised by the lower courts, emphasizing the importance of balancing procedural requirements with substantive justice. - Various legal principles and precedents are cited and analyzed throughout the proceedings, including the liberal interpretation of the concept of "sufficient cause" for condonation of delay and the significance of balancing substantive justice with procedural requirements. - Ultimately, the court dismisses the petition, affirming the lower courts' exercise of discretion to condone the delay.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
