Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Addition u/s 68 - unsecured loans Addition u/s 2(22)(e) - Deemed dividend - The Tribunal found merit in the Assessee's submissions, noting that all relevant documents were submitted to prove the legitimacy of the transaction. The addition under section 68 was reversed, and the AO was directed to delete the same. However, the addition under section 2(22)(e) was upheld, as the Assessee failed to provide substantial evidence to support the contention that the loan from M/s KAJ Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. was for business purposes.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
