Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Vicarious liability for dishonoured company cheques may extend to non-signatory directors where complaints contain foundational responsibility avermen...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Execution of Conveyance deed - Home Buyers / Commerical property - entitlement to receive the payment of rent as assured in the MoU entered with the allottees and the erstwhile management. - The Adjudicating Authority refused the appellant's prayer for the execution of a Conveyance Deed, stating that there was no specific prayer made in the application for this relief. Additionally, the Authority held that during the CIRP, the RP is responsible for managing the affairs of the Corporate Debtor, including decisions regarding the execution of contracts. The NCLAT also cited a previous judgment indicating that the rights of homebuyers cannot be adversely affected during CIRP, but the manner of protection depends on the RP's decisions.
Execution of Conveyance deed - Home Buyers / Commerical property - entitlement to receive the payment of rent as assured in the MoU entered with the allottees and the erstwhile management. - The Adjudicating Authority refused the appellant's prayer for the execution of a Conveyance Deed, stating that there was no specific prayer made in the application for this relief. Additionally, the Authority held that during the CIRP, the RP is responsible for managing the affairs of the Corporate Debtor, including decisions regarding the execution of contracts. The NCLAT also cited a previous judgment indicating that the rights of homebuyers cannot be adversely affected during CIRP, but the manner of protection depends on the RP's decisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
