Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Execution of Conveyance deed - Home Buyers / Commerical property - entitlement to receive the payment of rent as assured in the MoU entered with the allottees and the erstwhile management. - The Adjudicating Authority refused the appellant's prayer for the execution of a Conveyance Deed, stating that there was no specific prayer made in the application for this relief. Additionally, the Authority held that during the CIRP, the RP is responsible for managing the affairs of the Corporate Debtor, including decisions regarding the execution of contracts. The NCLAT also cited a previous judgment indicating that the rights of homebuyers cannot be adversely affected during CIRP, but the manner of protection depends on the RP's decisions.
Execution of Conveyance deed - Home Buyers / Commerical property - entitlement to receive the payment of rent as assured in the MoU entered with the allottees and the erstwhile management. - The Adjudicating Authority refused the appellant's prayer for the execution of a Conveyance Deed, stating that there was no specific prayer made in the application for this relief. Additionally, the Authority held that during the CIRP, the RP is responsible for managing the affairs of the Corporate Debtor, including decisions regarding the execution of contracts. The NCLAT also cited a previous judgment indicating that the rights of homebuyers cannot be adversely affected during CIRP, but the manner of protection depends on the RP's decisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
