Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Automatic Vacation of the interim order / Stay Order after six months - judicial legislation or not - The Supreme Court held that interim orders cannot automatically expire due to the lapse of time. Fundamental principles of natural justice require that any modification or vacation of such orders must occur through judicial examination, ensuring fairness to all parties involved. - The Court highlighted that while Article 142 empowers the Supreme Court to pass orders for doing complete justice, it cannot be used to annul lawful judicial orders en masse without considering individual case merits and the rights of those not present before the Court.
Automatic Vacation of the interim order / Stay Order after six months - judicial legislation or not - The Supreme Court held that interim orders cannot automatically expire due to the lapse of time. Fundamental principles of natural justice require that any modification or vacation of such orders must occur through judicial examination, ensuring fairness to all parties involved. - The Court highlighted that while Article 142 empowers the Supreme Court to pass orders for doing complete justice, it cannot be used to annul lawful judicial orders en masse without considering individual case merits and the rights of those not present before the Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.