Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Income from other sources u/s 56 (2) (x) - purchased the property - difference between the valuation adopted by the district valuation officer and actual consideration - While the appellant asserts the necessity of establishing "on money" payments to warrant taxation under the Act, the tribunal maintains that the absence of such evidence does not preclude the application of anti-avoidance provisions. - The tribunal upholds the decision of the CIT(A) to confirm the addition u/s 56(2)(x)(b), holding the appellant liable for the additional tax resulting from the disputed property valuation.
Income from other sources u/s 56 (2) (x) - purchased the property - difference between the valuation adopted by the district valuation officer and actual consideration - While the appellant asserts the necessity of establishing "on money" payments to warrant taxation under the Act, the tribunal maintains that the absence of such evidence does not preclude the application of anti-avoidance provisions. - The tribunal upholds the decision of the CIT(A) to confirm the addition u/s 56(2)(x)(b), holding the appellant liable for the additional tax resulting from the disputed property valuation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.