<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Confirms Additional Tax Due to Property Valuation Discrepancy u/s 56(2)(x)(b) of Income Tax Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75254</link>
    <description>Income from other sources u/s 56 (2) (x) - purchased the property - difference between the valuation adopted by the district valuation officer and actual consideration - While the appellant asserts the necessity of establishing &quot;on money&quot; payments to warrant taxation under the Act, the tribunal maintains that the absence of such evidence does not preclude the application of anti-avoidance provisions. - The tribunal upholds the decision of the CIT(A) to confirm the addition u/s 56(2)(x)(b), holding the appellant liable for the additional tax resulting from the disputed property valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:36:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:36:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Confirms Additional Tax Due to Property Valuation Discrepancy u/s 56(2)(x)(b) of Income Tax Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75254</link>
      <description>Income from other sources u/s 56 (2) (x) - purchased the property - difference between the valuation adopted by the district valuation officer and actual consideration - While the appellant asserts the necessity of establishing &quot;on money&quot; payments to warrant taxation under the Act, the tribunal maintains that the absence of such evidence does not preclude the application of anti-avoidance provisions. - The tribunal upholds the decision of the CIT(A) to confirm the addition u/s 56(2)(x)(b), holding the appellant liable for the additional tax resulting from the disputed property valuation.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:36:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>