Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Article 227 review permits intervention in arbitration only for manifest, patent inherent jurisdictional defects, not representational authority dispu...
Penalty on Customs Broker under Regulation 18 of CBLR, 2018 - violation of regulation 10(o) and Regulation 10(b) - Despite allegations of the exporter attempting fraudulent exports to avail excess GST refunds, the tribunal found no evidence of collusion between the appellant and the exporter. Therefore, holding the appellant accountable for the exporter's actions without any proof of collusion would be unjust. Penalty set aside.
Penalty on Customs Broker under Regulation 18 of CBLR, 2018 - violation of regulation 10(o) and Regulation 10(b) - Despite allegations of the exporter attempting fraudulent exports to avail excess GST refunds, the tribunal found no evidence of collusion between the appellant and the exporter. Therefore, holding the appellant accountable for the exporter's actions without any proof of collusion would be unjust. Penalty set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
