Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Section 153C jurisdiction requires timely deemed search and assessee-specific satisfaction material; otherwise reassessment must use the proper statut...
Levy of penalty - no E-Way Bill, invoice and bilty were present in the vehicle carrying the goods - onus to prove (shifting burden) - The High court held that the petitioner failed to rebut the presumption of tax evasion since they could not explain the absence of the invoice and E-Way Bill. Thus, the penalty imposed is upheld, emphasizing that penalties act as deterrents to tax evasion.
Levy of penalty - no E-Way Bill, invoice and bilty were present in the vehicle carrying the goods - onus to prove (shifting burden) - The High court held that the petitioner failed to rebut the presumption of tax evasion since they could not explain the absence of the invoice and E-Way Bill. Thus, the penalty imposed is upheld, emphasizing that penalties act as deterrents to tax evasion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4886 
