<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Penalty for Missing E-Way Bill, Invoice in Goods Transport; Highlights Deterrent Role Against Tax Evasion.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75151</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty - no E-Way Bill, invoice and bilty were present in the vehicle carrying the goods - onus to prove (shifting burden) - The High court held that the petitioner failed to rebut the presumption of tax evasion since they could not explain the absence of the invoice and E-Way Bill. Thus, the penalty imposed is upheld, emphasizing that penalties act as deterrents to tax evasion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:24:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:24:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Penalty for Missing E-Way Bill, Invoice in Goods Transport; Highlights Deterrent Role Against Tax Evasion.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75151</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty - no E-Way Bill, invoice and bilty were present in the vehicle carrying the goods - onus to prove (shifting burden) - The High court held that the petitioner failed to rebut the presumption of tax evasion since they could not explain the absence of the invoice and E-Way Bill. Thus, the penalty imposed is upheld, emphasizing that penalties act as deterrents to tax evasion.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:24:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>