Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - eligibility of exemption u/s 11 - The ITAT Mumbai found that the reopening of the assessment was based on incorrect premises since the assessee had filed the return of income. Moreover, it held that the application of Section 12A(1)(ba) by the CIT(A) was inappropriate for the relevant assessment years as the amendment was prospective and not retrospective. Consequently, the ITAT quashed the assessment orders.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - eligibility of exemption u/s 11 - The ITAT Mumbai found that the reopening of the assessment was based on incorrect premises since the assessee had filed the return of income. Moreover, it held that the application of Section 12A(1)(ba) by the CIT(A) was inappropriate for the relevant assessment years as the amendment was prospective and not retrospective. Consequently, the ITAT quashed the assessment orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.