Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - eligibility of exemption u/s 11 - The ITAT Mumbai found that the reopening of the assessment was based on incorrect premises since the assessee had filed the return of income. Moreover, it held that the application of Section 12A(1)(ba) by the CIT(A) was inappropriate for the relevant assessment years as the amendment was prospective and not retrospective. Consequently, the ITAT quashed the assessment orders.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - eligibility of exemption u/s 11 - The ITAT Mumbai found that the reopening of the assessment was based on incorrect premises since the assessee had filed the return of income. Moreover, it held that the application of Section 12A(1)(ba) by the CIT(A) was inappropriate for the relevant assessment years as the amendment was prospective and not retrospective. Consequently, the ITAT quashed the assessment orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
