Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Embezzlement losses in charitable institutions remain allowable when misappropriation is established, irrecoverable, and not a specified-person benefi...
National long-distance undertaking status supports deduction where separately licensed infrastructure, resources, revenue, and expenditure establish c...
Agency reimbursement income follows contractual deposit-liability computation, while pending deposit collections do not constitute deemed-dividend loa...
Page of 4883
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 97649 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Protective addition on account of unexplained credit entries appearing in the bank account - assessee company is a conduit - addition on account of unaccounted commission @ 0.25 % of total unexplained credit entries - The CIT(A) had deleted these additions, finding that the assessee acted as a conduit for accommodation entries, with identified beneficiaries, thus no further addition was warranted in the assessee's hands. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that since the assessee operated as a conduit managed by certain individuals for providing accommodation entries, no addition for commission income was justified.
Protective addition on account of unexplained credit entries appearing in the bank account - assessee company is a conduit - addition on account of unaccounted commission @ 0.25 % of total unexplained credit entries - The CIT(A) had deleted these additions, finding that the assessee acted as a conduit for accommodation entries, with identified beneficiaries, thus no further addition was warranted in the assessee's hands. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that since the assessee operated as a conduit managed by certain individuals for providing accommodation entries, no addition for commission income was justified.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4883 
