<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Income Tax Tribunal Upholds Decision: No Additional Commission on Unexplained Credit Entries as Company Acted as Conduit.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74766</link>
    <description>Protective addition on account of unexplained credit entries appearing in the bank account - assessee company is a conduit - addition on account of unaccounted commission @ 0.25 % of total unexplained credit entries - The CIT(A) had deleted these additions, finding that the assessee acted as a conduit for accommodation entries, with identified beneficiaries, thus no further addition was warranted in the assessee&#039;s hands. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, noting that since the assessee operated as a conduit managed by certain individuals for providing accommodation entries, no addition for commission income was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 07:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 07:21:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Income Tax Tribunal Upholds Decision: No Additional Commission on Unexplained Credit Entries as Company Acted as Conduit.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74766</link>
      <description>Protective addition on account of unexplained credit entries appearing in the bank account - assessee company is a conduit - addition on account of unaccounted commission @ 0.25 % of total unexplained credit entries - The CIT(A) had deleted these additions, finding that the assessee acted as a conduit for accommodation entries, with identified beneficiaries, thus no further addition was warranted in the assessee&#039;s hands. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, noting that since the assessee operated as a conduit managed by certain individuals for providing accommodation entries, no addition for commission income was justified.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 07:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>