Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Customs exemptions cover photovoltaic assembly machinery and PVF backsheets, while fully declared cleared imports may avoid confiscation and penalties...
Specific tariff classification for LCD devices overrides treatment as electricity-meter parts, defeating differential duty, extended limitation, and p...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of ...
Indirect corporate control can create related-party status, excluding financial creditors from Committee of Creditors representation, participation an...
Scientific research association approval requires continuing SIRO status, annual donation reporting, and donor certificates for the approved foundatio...
Page of 4888
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 97755 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Protective addition on account of unexplained credit entries appearing in the bank account - assessee company is a conduit - addition on account of unaccounted commission @ 0.25 % of total unexplained credit entries - The CIT(A) had deleted these additions, finding that the assessee acted as a conduit for accommodation entries, with identified beneficiaries, thus no further addition was warranted in the assessee's hands. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that since the assessee operated as a conduit managed by certain individuals for providing accommodation entries, no addition for commission income was justified.
Protective addition on account of unexplained credit entries appearing in the bank account - assessee company is a conduit - addition on account of unaccounted commission @ 0.25 % of total unexplained credit entries - The CIT(A) had deleted these additions, finding that the assessee acted as a conduit for accommodation entries, with identified beneficiaries, thus no further addition was warranted in the assessee's hands. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that since the assessee operated as a conduit managed by certain individuals for providing accommodation entries, no addition for commission income was justified.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.