Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Article 227 review permits intervention in arbitration only for manifest, patent inherent jurisdictional defects, not representational authority dispu...
Levy of penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 on the owners of the seized goods - Allegation that, pulses (URAD ki Dal) in question were meant for illegal export from India to Nepal - Requirement to cross-examination of the witnesses. Genuineness of the Punchnama - panch witnesses are stated to be ‘daily wage laborers'. - The tribunal set aside the penalty in the absence of allowing cross-examination of witness.
Levy of penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 on the owners of the seized goods - Allegation that, pulses (URAD ki Dal) in question were meant for illegal export from India to Nepal - Requirement to cross-examination of the witnesses. Genuineness of the Punchnama - panch witnesses are stated to be ‘daily wage laborers'. - The tribunal set aside the penalty in the absence of allowing cross-examination of witness.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
