Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Interest for delay in payment of Output Tax - return was not declared within the prescribed time - claim of less ITC wrongly however remaining amount was lying in ECRL - The High Court refers to the amendment of Section 50(1) of the CGST Act, which provides that interest would be levied only on the portion of the tax paid by debiting the electronic cash ledger. - The High Court concludes that the notice and impugned order should be set aside and remanded back for reconsideration, taking into consideration the amendment to Section 50(1) and the petitioner's argument regarding the inadvertent mistake.
Interest for delay in payment of Output Tax - return was not declared within the prescribed time - claim of less ITC wrongly however remaining amount was lying in ECRL - The High Court refers to the amendment of Section 50(1) of the CGST Act, which provides that interest would be levied only on the portion of the tax paid by debiting the electronic cash ledger. - The High Court concludes that the notice and impugned order should be set aside and remanded back for reconsideration, taking into consideration the amendment to Section 50(1) and the petitioner's argument regarding the inadvertent mistake.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
